All Ratings
Factor
ImpactTeam Elevator
How much better their teams became than talent alone predicted.
130entities ranked
Team Elevator Leaderboard
| # | Entity | Score | Bar | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikola Jokicplayer | 95 | Jokic consistently posts elite on/off differentials (+10 to +15 net rating splits across multiple seasons), transforms role players into career-best performers (Aaron Gordon, Michael Porter Jr., Bruce Brown all peaked offensively alongside him), and dragged a depleted 2023 roster missing Murray and Porter for stretches to the NBA championship through his playmaking gravity that creates open shots for everyone. | ||
| Steve Nashplayer | 95 | Nash's back-to-back MVPs were built on transforming Phoenix into the league's most efficient offense, with role players like Shawn Marion, Amar'e Stoudemire, and Raja Bell posting career-best efficiency numbers that declined when separated from him, while his on/off splits consistently showed 8-12 point differential swings. | ||
| LeBron Jamesplayer | 95 | LeBron's career is defined by transforming lottery rosters into Finals contenders (2007, 2018 Cavs), generating massive on/off differentials throughout his career (+10 to +15 net rating swings), and consistently producing career-best seasons from role players (Mike Miller, Norris Cole, Tristan Thompson, Jordan Clarkson) who regressed significantly after leaving his teams. | ||
| Magic Johnsonplayer | 95 | Magic Johnson transformed the Lakers into Showtime, elevating role players like Byron Scott, Michael Cooper, and James Worthy to All-Star/championship-caliber performances while his teams consistently overachieved relative to roster talent, winning five championships with supporting casts that were demonstrably better with him orchestrating the offense. | ||
| 5 | Stephen Curryplayer | 92 | Curry's gravity-based offensive system consistently generated wide-open shots for teammates, evidenced by the Warriors' historic offensive ratings with him on court, transforming role players like Draymond Green into All-Stars and producing some of the largest on/off differentials in NBA history while enabling a motion offense that made every teammate more efficient. | |
| 6 | Bob Cousyplayer | 88 | Cousy orchestrated the Celtics' revolutionary fast-break system that transformed role players like Jim Loscutoff and Frank Ramsey into championship contributors, with his passing creating easy scoring opportunities that elevated teammates' efficiency beyond their individual capabilities, though he operated within a talent-rich environment that prevents placement in the highest tier. | |
| 6 | Oscar Robertsonplayer | 88 | Robertson's revolutionary triple-double production (averaging a triple-double in 1961-62) directly translated to making teammates better through his elite playmaking and basketball IQ, as evidenced by Cincinnati's consistent overperformance relative to roster talent and teammates like Jerry Lucas and Jack Twyman having career-best efficiency alongside him, plus his immediate impact elevating Milwaukee to a championship in his final season. | |
| 6 | John Stocktonplayer | 88 | Stockton's elite playmaking consistently elevated teammates throughout his career, most notably turning Jeff Hornacek and Jeff Malone into career-best scorers and making Karl Malone a perennial MVP candidate through perfectly timed feeds, while Utah's offensive efficiency consistently ranked top-5 league-wide despite lacking overwhelming individual talent beyond the Stockton-Malone duo. | |
| 6 | Jason Kiddplayer | 88 | Kidd's elite court vision and pace-pushing transformed teammates' efficiency throughout his career, evidenced by the Nets jumping from 26 to 52 wins in his first season and consistent on/off splits showing teammates shooting significantly better percentages with him on court, particularly spot-up shooters and rim-runners who benefited from his elite playmaking. | |
| 6 | Bill Russellplayer | 88 | Russell's Celtics won 11 championships in 13 years with a roster that featured role players who rarely succeeded elsewhere, while his defensive orchestration and unselfish playmaking created a system where teammates like Sam Jones, Tom Heinsohn, and others had career-defining success they couldn't replicate without him. | |
| 6 | Bill Waltonplayer | 88 | Walton's peak Blazers (1976-77) and championship Celtics (1985-86) dramatically overperformed talent expectations, with teammates like Lionel Hollins and Kevin McHale posting career-best efficiency numbers alongside his elite passing and defensive orchestration, though his impact was limited by injuries preventing the sustained elevation seen in the top tier. | |
| 12 | Chris Paulplayer | 85 | Chris Paul consistently elevated teammates throughout his career, with players like DeAndre Jordan, Blake Griffin, and Clint Capela achieving career-best efficiency alongside him, supported by elite on/off differentials that showed teams performing significantly better with him on the court across multiple franchises. | |
| 13 | Moses Maloneplayer | 82 | Moses Malone transformed multiple franchises into contenders (Rockets to Finals 1981, 76ers to championship 1983 with 'Fo-Fo-Fo' prediction), with teammates like Bobby Jones and Andrew Toney having career-best seasons alongside him, while his relentless offensive rebounding created second-chance opportunities that systematically elevated team efficiency beyond his individual statistics. | |
| 13 | Scottie Pippenplayer | 82 | Pippen's elite defensive versatility, playmaking (6.4 APG as a forward), and willingness to facilitate allowed teammates like Toni Kukoc, Steve Kerr, and John Paxson to thrive in their roles, while his 1993-94 season leading a Jordan-less Bulls to 55 wins and near-MVP consideration demonstrated clear elevating impact beyond his own production. | |
| 13 | Luka Doncicplayer | 82 | Luka consistently elevates role players into career-best efficiency seasons through elite playmaking that generates high-quality shots, with Dallas overperforming talent expectations in multiple playoff runs and teammates like Dorian Finney-Smith, Maxi Kleber, and Derrick Jones Jr. posting significantly better offensive metrics alongside him. | |
| 13 | Larry Birdplayer | 82 | Bird's Celtics consistently overperformed talent expectations, with role players like Danny Ainge, Dennis Johnson, and Robert Parish having career-best efficiency alongside him due to his elite passing, floor spacing, and basketball IQ that created optimal offensive environments. | |
| 13 | Tim Duncanplayer | 82 | Duncan's Spurs consistently overperformed their talent level across two decades, with role players like Bruce Bowen, Danny Green, and Tiago Splitter having career-best seasons alongside him while his defensive anchoring and unselfish offensive system elevated teammates' efficiency metrics significantly. | |
| 13 | Isiah Thomasplayer | 82 | Isiah Thomas orchestrated back-to-back championships with a roster lacking other superstars, consistently elevated role players like Joe Dumars, Vinnie Johnson, and Bill Laimbeer to career-best performances, and demonstrated elite playmaking that made the Bad Boy Pistons far more effective than their individual talent suggested. | |
| 13 | Kevin Garnettplayer | 82 | Garnett transformed Minnesota into a perennial playoff team despite weak supporting casts, consistently elevated role players like Wally Szczerbiak and Sprewell to career-best efficiency, and his defensive orchestration and unselfish playmaking made Boston's Big Three era teammates demonstrably better in on/off metrics. | |
| 13 | Draymond Greenplayer | 82 | Green's elite defensive orchestration, playmaking from the forward spot, and screening created a system that consistently maximized teammates' efficiency, with Warriors showing dramatic on/off splits and role players repeatedly having career-best shooting percentages alongside him. | |
| 13 | Wes Unseldplayer | 82 | Unseld's exceptional outlet passing and screening immediately transformed the Bullets into contenders upon his arrival (winning 57 games as a rookie after a 36-win season), with teammates consistently posting career-best efficiency playing off his screens and transition orchestration, though he lacked the ball-dominant playmaking of the top-tier elevators. | |
| 13 | Michael Jordanplayer | 82 | Jordan's teammates consistently performed better in his presence, with role players like Steve Kerr, John Paxson, and B.J. Armstrong having career-best seasons alongside him, though his scoring dominance meant he elevated through gravity and defensive attention rather than direct playmaking like the top-tier facilitators. | |
| 23 | Pau Gasolplayer | 78 | Gasol's arrival in LA transformed the Lakers from a first-round exit team to back-to-back champions, with teammates like Bynum, Odom, and Ariza posting career-best efficiency numbers playing alongside his elite passing and high-post facilitation that created easier shots for everyone. | |
| 23 | George Mikanplayer | 78 | Mikan transformed the Minneapolis Lakers from a struggling franchise into a dynasty with five championships in six years, with teammates like Jim Pollard and Vern Mikkelsen having their best seasons alongside him as he drew constant double-teams that created open opportunities, though the era's limited statistical tracking prevents definitive on/off analysis. | |
| 23 | Bob Pettitplayer | 78 | Pettit led the Hawks to the 1958 championship and consistent contention despite modest supporting casts, with teammates like Cliff Hagan and Clyde Lovellette having their best years alongside him, though the era's limited statistical tracking makes precise on/off quantification impossible. | |
| 23 | Walt Frazierplayer | 78 | Frazier's exceptional court vision, defensive intensity, and unselfish playmaking consistently elevated Knicks teammates like DeBusschere, Bradley, and Reed to career-best performances during championship runs, with the team's ball movement and defensive cohesion visibly deteriorating in his absence. | |
| 23 | John Havlicekplayer | 78 | Havlicek's versatility and selfless play consistently elevated Celtics teammates across multiple championship runs, with his ability to play multiple positions and facilitate offense making role players more effective, though he lacked the pure playmaking gravity of the highest-tier elevators. | |
| 23 | Dave Cowensplayer | 78 | Cowens' relentless energy, versatility as a passing big man, and willingness to do everything elevated the Celtics beyond their talent level in the mid-1970s, with teammates like Paul Silas and Jo Jo White performing at career-best levels alongside his all-out style that created opportunities through constant motion and unselfish play. | |
| 23 | Giannis Antetokounmpoplayer | 78 | Giannis's gravity and elite rim pressure consistently create open looks for teammates, with Milwaukee's offense historically elite when he plays and role players like Brook Lopez and Khris Middleton posting career-best efficiency alongside him, though he lacks the pure playmaking orchestration of top-tier elevators. | |
| 23 | David Robinsonplayer | 78 | Robinson elevated Spurs from lottery team to consistent contender immediately upon arrival, with teammates like Sean Elliott and Avery Johnson having career-best efficiency alongside him, though he needed Duncan's arrival to reach the Finals, suggesting strong but not transcendent elevation effect. | |
| 23 | Penny Hardawayplayer | 78 | Hardaway's Orlando teams consistently overperformed expectations (1995 Finals run, 60-win 1996 season) with a roster built around his playmaking, and teammates like Nick Anderson and Dennis Scott had career-best efficiency years playing alongside him before his injuries derailed the Magic's trajectory. | |
| 23 | Shaquille O'Nealplayer | 78 | Shaq's dominant interior presence consistently created wide-open perimeter shots for teammates, with role players like Derek Fisher, Robert Horry, and Brian Shaw posting career-best efficiency numbers during championship runs, though his impact was more structural (gravity/spacing) than playmaking-driven elevation like the top-tier facilitators. | |
| 23 | Nate Archibaldplayer | 78 | Archibald's 1981 Celtics championship run demonstrated clear elevation effect as he orchestrated an offense that made teammates like Cedric Maxwell and Robert Parish significantly more efficient, while his earlier Kings teams consistently overperformed talent expectations through his elite playmaking that created open looks and career-best shooting percentages for role players. | |
| 23 | Charles Barkleyplayer | 78 | Barkley consistently elevated mediocre rosters (1993 Suns to Finals, perennial playoff teams in Philadelphia despite limited talent), with teammates like Dan Majerle, Kevin Johnson, and role players posting career-best efficiency alongside him, though he lacked the pure playmaking gravity of top-tier elevators. | |
| 23 | Dikembe Mutomboplayer | 78 | Mutombo's elite rim protection and defensive anchoring consistently elevated team defenses to top-5 rankings across multiple franchises (Denver, Atlanta, Philadelphia), with teammates benefiting from his paint presence that allowed perimeter defenders to play more aggressively, though his offensive limitations prevented him from reaching the highest tier of team elevation. | |
| 23 | Dwight Howardplayer | 78 | Howard's defensive anchoring in Orlando (2008-2012) transformed mediocre offensive teammates into playoff contenders, with the Magic overachieving their talent level significantly during his DPOY peak, though his offensive limitations and declining impact post-back injury prevent him from reaching the 'Lifted Everyone' tier. | |
| 23 | Chauncey Billupsplayer | 78 | Billups transformed the Pistons from a talented but underachieving team into champions, with teammates like Rip Hamilton and Tayshaun Prince having career-best efficiency alongside him, while his floor generalship and clutch play consistently elevated role players' effectiveness through his elite decision-making and leadership. | |
| 23 | Rick Barryplayer | 78 | Barry's exceptional passing vision and willingness to facilitate (5.1 APG as a forward) combined with his gravity as a scorer made teammates consistently more effective, evidenced by the Warriors' dramatic improvement from lottery team to championship contender upon his arrival in 1972 and multiple role players having career years alongside him. | |
| 23 | Julius Ervingplayer | 78 | Erving transformed the Nets into ABA champions and elevated the 76ers from perennial contenders to champions, with teammates like Caldwell Jones, Bobby Jones, and Maurice Cheeks consistently performing above their individual talent levels in his system, though he lacked the pure playmaking gravity of the top-tier elevators. | |
| 23 | Hakeem Olajuwonplayer | 78 | Olajuwon elevated role players like Robert Horry, Sam Cassell, and Kenny Smith to career-best performances during championship runs, with the 1994-95 Rockets winning despite being a sixth seed largely due to his ability to make teammates better through elite defensive anchoring and unselfish offensive play that created open looks. | |
| 23 | Jimmy Butlerplayer | 78 | Butler has consistently elevated teammates throughout his career, most notably transforming Miami's supporting cast into Finals contenders in 2020 and 2023, with players like Duncan Robinson, Tyler Herro, and Max Strus having career-defining performances alongside him, while his on/off differentials in Chicago and Minnesota showed significant positive team impact beyond his individual production. | |
| 23 | Trae Youngplayer | 78 | Young's elite playmaking consistently generates wide-open looks that elevate role players' efficiency, evidenced by teammates like John Collins, Bogdan Bogdanovic, and Clint Capela posting career-best shooting percentages alongside him, while his on/off splits show significant team offensive rating improvements when he plays. | |
| 23 | Kyle Lowryplayer | 78 | Lowry consistently elevated Toronto's offense through elite playmaking and floor spacing, with the Raptors posting significantly better net ratings with him on court throughout his tenure, and teammates like DeMar DeRozan and Pascal Siakam achieving career-best efficiency playing alongside him. | |
| 23 | Kareem Abdul-Jabbarplayer | 78 | Kareem's teams consistently overperformed expectations throughout his career, with the Bucks immediately becoming contenders upon his arrival and Lakers role players like Michael Cooper and Jamaal Wilkes having career-best efficiency playing alongside him, though his impact was more through creating offensive gravity and reliable scoring than the playmaking elevation of top-tier facilitators. | |
| 23 | Willis Reedplayer | 78 | Reed's leadership and two-way impact transformed the Knicks from perennial underachievers into champions, with teammates like DeBusschere, Frazier, and Bradley all having career-best seasons during Reed's peak years, while his presence as defensive anchor and unselfish offensive hub enabled the team's ball-movement system to function at elite levels. | |
| 23 | Chris Webberplayer | 78 | Webber's elite passing vision for a big man (4.2 APG career, 4.8 in Sacramento peak) and high-post orchestration made the Kings' Princeton offense hum, with teammates like Peja Stojaković, Mike Bibby, and Doug Christie having career-best seasons playing off his playmaking, though he wasn't quite the transformative force of the top-tier elevators. | |
| 23 | Grant Hillplayer | 78 | Hill's early Detroit teams significantly overperformed talent expectations, with role players like Terry Mills and Allan Houston posting career-best efficiency alongside him, while his elite playmaking (5+ APG as a wing) and unselfish style consistently elevated teammates' offensive output before injuries derailed his prime. | |
| 23 | Connie Hawkinsplayer | 78 | Hawkins transformed the Phoenix Suns from a 16-66 expansion team to 39-43 in his first NBA season (1969-70), with teammates like Dick Van Arsdale and Gail Goodrich experiencing career-best efficiency playing alongside his dynamic playmaking and gravity as a scorer. | |
| 23 | Ben Wallaceplayer | 78 | Wallace anchored Detroit's championship defense that consistently overperformed offensive talent limitations, with the Pistons' defensive rating dramatically better with him on court and role players like Tayshaun Prince and Rip Hamilton thriving in his defensive system that created transition opportunities. | |
| 23 | Dave DeBusschereplayer | 78 | DeBusschere's arrival transformed the Knicks from a 43-win team to immediate championship contenders, with his defensive versatility, unselfish play, and leadership enabling teammates like Frazier and Reed to flourish in their roles within a cohesive system that won two titles. | |
| 23 | Manu Ginobiliplayer | 78 | Ginobili's elite playmaking, selfless off-ball movement, and willingness to sacrifice usage consistently elevated role players and bench units, with the Spurs' second unit historically dominant during his sixth-man years and teammates like Parker and Duncan benefiting from his gravity and passing. | |
| 52 | Ja Morantplayer | 72 | Morant's explosive scoring and transition playmaking generate significant offensive value, but the Grizzlies' success has been more about collective depth and defensive identity than individual teammate elevation—evidenced by their 20-2 record without him in 2021-22 and strong performance during his suspensions. | |
| 52 | Clyde Drexlerplayer | 72 | Drexler was an excellent all-around player who made Portland consistently competitive and helped Houston win titles, but his impact was more about his own elite two-way production than systematically elevating role players—teammates like Terry Porter and Buck Williams were already quality players, and his on/off differentials were solid but not transformative like the top-tier elevators. | |
| 52 | Victor Wembanyamaplayer | 72 | Wembanyama's elite rim protection and spacing ability clearly improve team performance, but the Spurs' overall record and teammate performance metrics show his impact tracks closely with his own production rather than systematically elevating role players beyond their typical output in his rookie/sophomore seasons. | |
| 52 | Jerry Westplayer | 72 | West was an elite scorer and clutch performer who elevated Lakers to consistent contention, but his impact was more through his own exceptional production than systematically making teammates better—his teams' success tracked closely with his individual output rather than showing the multiplier effects of playmaking-first stars. | |
| 52 | Tony Parkerplayer | 72 | Parker was an efficient offensive engine whose production correlated strongly with Spurs success, but his impact was largely contained within the system rather than visibly elevating individual teammates' careers—most Spurs role players maintained similar efficiency with or without him on court, and the team's overperformance was more attributable to Duncan and Popovich's system than Parker's multiplicative effect. | |
| 52 | Dennis Johnsonplayer | 72 | Dennis Johnson was an elite defensive playmaker whose teams consistently won at high levels (5 Finals, 2 championships), but his impact was more about complementing star teammates (Bird, Archibald) through defense and steady point guard play rather than dramatically elevating role players' offensive performance beyond their talent level. | |
| 52 | Elgin Baylorplayer | 72 | Baylor was an elite individual scorer who elevated the Lakers to consistent contention, but his ball-dominant style and the lack of dramatic teammate improvement (no All-Stars emerged primarily due to playing with him) suggests his impact tracked closely with his own production rather than creating multiplicative effects. | |
| 52 | Dwyane Wadeplayer | 72 | Wade's 2006 Finals run and 2009 MVP-caliber season showed elite individual production that carried Miami, but his teammates (outside LeBron/Bosh era) rarely had career-best years playing alongside him, and his on/off differentials were strong but not transformative like Nash or LeBron's. | |
| 52 | Jack Sikmaplayer | 72 | Sikma was an excellent passing big man and high-IQ player who facilitated well from the post and set strong screens, but his impact was more about consistent two-way production than transforming teammates' performance—Seattle's success correlated with his steady all-around play rather than dramatic elevation of surrounding talent. | |
| 52 | Dolph Schayesplayer | 72 | Schayes was the centerpiece of consistently competitive Syracuse Nationals teams (1949-1963) that won one championship and made multiple Finals appearances, but his impact was more about reliable high-level production and versatility as a scoring big man rather than demonstrably elevating lesser teammates beyond their natural talent levels. | |
| 62 | Damian Lillardplayer | 68 | Lillard's elite scoring and clutch shot-making drove Portland's success proportionally to his production, but on/off data and teammate performance patterns show limited systematic elevation beyond his own offensive output, with role players rarely experiencing career-best efficiency alongside him compared to archetypes like Nash or Paul. | |
| 62 | Sidney Moncriefplayer | 68 | Moncrief was an elite two-way player whose defensive intensity and leadership helped the Bucks consistently overachieve in the early 1980s, but his offensive game was more complementary than transformative, and teammates didn't show dramatic statistical improvements playing alongside him compared to the multiplier effect seen with pure facilitators. | |
| 62 | Artis Gilmoreplayer | 68 | Gilmore was an elite rim protector and efficient scorer whose teams consistently performed well when he played, but his impact was primarily through his own dominant production rather than systematically elevating teammates' performance—his ABA championship teams had strong supporting casts, and his NBA teams' success correlated closely with his individual statistics without evidence of the multiplicative teammate improvement seen in higher bands. | |
| 62 | Derrick Roseplayer | 68 | Rose's MVP season elevated Chicago to 62 wins, but his impact was primarily through his own elite production rather than systematically making teammates better—his on/off splits showed strong team performance, yet teammates like Boozer and Deng didn't experience career-year effects, and post-injury his teams consistently underperformed expectations despite flashes of individual brilliance. | |
| 62 | Kawhi Leonardplayer | 68 | Kawhi's elite two-way play consistently correlates with team success, but his reserved leadership style and load management limit the consistent teammate elevation seen in higher tiers—his 2019 Raptors run showed strong performance but relied heavily on his own production rather than systematically making role players better across multiple seasons. | |
| 62 | Amar'e Stoudemireplayer | 68 | Stoudemire was a highly productive offensive force whose teams performed well when he played, but his impact was primarily through his own elite scoring and finishing rather than systematically elevating teammates—his Phoenix success was largely tied to Nash's playmaking, and his Knicks tenure showed strong individual production without transforming the roster beyond expectations. | |
| 62 | Jo Jo Whiteplayer | 68 | Jo Jo White was a highly productive two-way guard who anchored the Celtics' offense in the mid-1970s, but his impact was primarily through his own consistent scoring and playmaking rather than dramatically elevating teammates beyond their natural talent levels, as evidenced by the Celtics' success correlating closely with the presence of Hall of Famers Cowens and Havlicek rather than White creating breakout seasons for role players. | |
| 62 | Dirk Nowitzkiplayer | 68 | Nowitzki's offensive gravity and spacing created opportunities for teammates, but Dallas's success correlated primarily with his own elite scoring rather than systematic elevation of role players beyond their baseline talent levels. | |
| 62 | Jayson Tatumplayer | 68 | Tatum's production correlates strongly with team success but on/off data shows modest teammate elevation effects, with the Celtics' offensive rating improving primarily through his own scoring rather than systematic enhancement of role players' performance. | |
| 62 | Shai Gilgeous-Alexanderplayer | 68 | SGA's elite scoring and playmaking have driven OKC's rise, but the team's overperformance is more attributable to collective young talent development and elite defense than to SGA making individual teammates demonstrably better beyond what their own growth trajectories predicted. | |
| 62 | Nate Thurmondplayer | 68 | Thurmond was an elite defensive anchor and rebounder whose teams performed well when he played, but there's limited evidence of systematic teammate elevation beyond his own exceptional two-way production; his Warriors and Bulls teams largely tracked with his individual contributions rather than exceeding talent expectations. | |
| 62 | Gary Paytonplayer | 68 | Payton was an elite defensive anchor whose impact elevated team performance significantly on that end, but his offensive game was more individually productive than multiplicative—he ran the offense efficiently in Seattle but didn't consistently make teammates dramatically better scorers, with his teams' success tracking closely to his own two-way production rather than creating the systematic elevation seen in higher tiers. | |
| 62 | Anthony Edwardsplayer | 68 | Edwards has shown flashes of elevating teammates in playoff runs (2024 WCF) and his on/off splits are positive, but the Timberwolves' success correlates primarily with his individual scoring output rather than systematic teammate improvement, with role players performing inconsistently when he's on the floor. | |
| 62 | Yao Mingplayer | 68 | Yao Ming's presence significantly improved Houston's offensive efficiency and spacing, but his impact was largely tied to his own elite production rather than systematically elevating role players' careers, with the team's success closely tracking his availability and statistical output. | |
| 62 | Paul Arizinplayer | 68 | Arizin was a prolific scorer who anchored Warriors teams to competitive records during his era, but evidence suggests his impact was primarily through his own elite production rather than systematically elevating teammates' performance beyond their baseline talent levels. | |
| 62 | Jerry Lucasplayer | 68 | Lucas was an elite rebounder and passer for a big man whose cerebral play and outlet passing helped teams function efficiently, but his impact was more about complementing star teammates (Robertson, Reed, Frazier) than transforming roster talent—his Knicks won titles with him as a key role player rather than the primary elevator. | |
| 62 | Joe Dumarsplayer | 68 | Dumars was an excellent complementary player whose steady two-way excellence and clutch playoff performances contributed directly to Detroit's championships, but he operated within a system-driven framework where the Bad Boys' collective defense and balanced offense mattered more than individual elevation effects. | |
| 62 | Karl Maloneplayer | 68 | Malone was an exceptionally productive player whose teams performed well largely in proportion to his elite individual production, but he relied heavily on Stockton's playmaking to maximize his efficiency and didn't demonstrably elevate teammates beyond what their talent suggested—his teams' success tracked closely with the combined talent of the Stockton-Malone duo rather than showing uplift beyond their individual contributions. | |
| 62 | Patrick Ewingplayer | 68 | Ewing was the centerpiece of consistently competitive Knicks teams throughout the 1990s, but his impact was more about anchoring elite defense and providing reliable production than systematically elevating role players—teammates like Starks, Oakley, and Mason were solid contributors but didn't experience dramatic career transformations playing alongside him. | |
| 62 | Hal Greerplayer | 68 | Greer was a highly consistent scorer and secondary playmaker on championship 76ers teams, but the offensive system ran primarily through Wilt Chamberlain and later Billy Cunningham, with Greer's production largely reflecting his own elite shooting and scoring rather than demonstrable elevation of teammates' performance beyond expected levels. | |
| 62 | Dennis Rodmanplayer | 68 | Rodman's elite rebounding and defense directly improved team performance in measurable ways (Bulls' defensive rating improved significantly with him, Pistons' championship runs), but his impact was primarily through his own exceptional production rather than making individual teammates demonstrably better at their roles. | |
| 62 | Wilt Chamberlainplayer | 68 | Wilt's teams generally performed in line with their talent level rather than exceeding it; his 76ers and Lakers won championships with strong supporting casts, but teammates rarely had career-best seasons playing alongside him, and his individual dominance didn't consistently translate to overperformance relative to roster quality the way true elevators achieved. | |
| 62 | Devin Bookerplayer | 68 | Booker's production correlates strongly with team success (Suns' rise from lottery to Finals coincided with his prime), but on/off data shows modest teammate improvement and few career-year effects beyond role players in structured systems, placing him above pure scorers like Durant but below proven multipliers. | |
| 85 | Kobe Bryantplayer | 65 | Kobe's teams performed in line with his elite production but teammates rarely had career years playing alongside him, with on/off data showing solid but not exceptional lift, and his ball-dominant style meant he added tremendous value without the systematic elevation of role players seen in higher tiers. | |
| 85 | Kevin Durantplayer | 65 | Durant's elite scoring efficiency and gravity create spacing that benefits teammates, but his teams' success has tracked closely with his individual production rather than systematically elevating role players beyond their typical performance levels, as evidenced by modest on/off differentials relative to his usage and limited career-year breakouts among his teammates. | |
| 87 | Reggie Millerplayer | 62 | Miller was an elite floor spacer whose gravity created opportunities, but his teammates' performance largely tracked with his own scoring output rather than showing systematic elevation beyond what his shooting threat alone provided. | |
| 87 | Donovan Mitchellplayer | 62 | Mitchell's teams have generally performed in line with their talent level rather than exceeding it; his on/off splits show solid positive impact but teammates haven't consistently elevated to career-best performances around him, and both Utah and Cleveland rosters have performed roughly as their collective talent would predict. | |
| 87 | Alonzo Mourningplayer | 62 | Mourning was an elite defensive anchor and consistent scorer whose teams performed roughly in line with their talent level, elevating Miami and Charlotte to playoff contention but without the systematic teammate improvement seen in higher tiers—his departure and return to Miami showed team performance tracked closely with his individual production rather than creating multiplicative effects. | |
| 87 | Bob Lanierplayer | 62 | Lanier was a highly skilled center who produced excellent individual numbers and made teammates better through his passing and interior presence, but his teams (Pistons, Bucks) generally performed in line with their talent level rather than exceeding expectations, never reaching the Finals despite his All-Star caliber play. | |
| 87 | Paul Pierceplayer | 62 | Pierce was a highly productive scorer and clutch performer whose teams generally performed in line with their talent level, but he didn't consistently elevate role players' careers or generate significant positive on/off differentials beyond his own substantial contributions. | |
| 87 | Chris Boshplayer | 62 | Bosh was an excellent complementary star who adapted his game to fit alongside Wade and LeBron in Miami, and provided solid two-way impact in Toronto, but didn't demonstrably elevate teammates beyond what his own production suggested—his teams performed roughly in line with their talent level rather than exceeding it. | |
| 87 | Shawn Kempplayer | 62 | Kemp was a devastating finisher and lob threat whose athleticism and scoring production elevated Seattle's offense, but his impact was primarily through his own elite production rather than systematically making teammates better—Gary Payton's playmaking drove much of the team's elevation effect while Kemp converted opportunities at an elite level. | |
| 87 | Chet Walkerplayer | 62 | Chet Walker was a highly efficient complementary scorer on championship teams (1967 76ers, 1970s Bulls playoff squads) who performed his role excellently but didn't demonstrably elevate teammates beyond what their talent suggested—his teams succeeded when talent aligned rather than overachieving. | |
| 87 | Robert Parishplayer | 62 | Parish was a highly efficient, low-maintenance center who complemented Bird and McHale perfectly in Boston's system, but his impact was more about fitting seamlessly into an elite structure than elevating lesser teammates—his pre-Boston and post-prime years showed solid but unremarkable team performance relative to roster talent. | |
| 87 | Sam Jonesplayer | 62 | Sam Jones was an elite scorer and clutch performer on dynasty Celtics teams, but played alongside multiple Hall of Famers in a system orchestrated by Russell and Cousy/Havlicek, making it difficult to isolate significant teammate elevation beyond his own excellent production in his defined role. | |
| 87 | James Worthyplayer | 62 | Worthy was an elite finisher and transition weapon whose production scaled with the Lakers' talent level, but he operated primarily within the system created by Magic Johnson and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar rather than elevating role players around him—his impact was additive to an already elite core without evidence of making marginal teammates significantly better. | |
| 87 | Earl Monroeplayer | 62 | Monroe was a prolific individual scorer whose teams performed roughly in line with their talent level—the Bullets won a championship in 1978 with strong surrounding talent, but there's limited evidence he systematically elevated role players beyond what their abilities suggested. | |
| 87 | Bill Sharmanplayer | 62 | Sharman was an elite shooter and consummate professional whose production directly contributed to Celtics championships, but he played alongside multiple Hall of Famers (Cousy, Russell) in a system where his role was more complementary than transformative of teammates' abilities. | |
| 87 | Ray Allenplayer | 62 | Ray Allen was an elite floor spacer whose gravity created opportunities for teammates, but his impact was primarily through his own elite shooting production rather than systematic elevation of role players' performance—teammates benefited from his spacing but didn't consistently post career-best numbers playing alongside him. |